25 Oct 2020


Dispatches: Giving Justice the Slip

"On our many research trips to South Sudan, civilian victims repeatedly told us that only justice can truly break their country’s cycle of crime and conflict."

 JUNE 8, 2016 Dispatches

Dispatches: Giving Justice the Slip

Elise Keppler

Associate Director, International Justice Program EliseKeppler

After leading South Sudan into a two-year nightmare, its leaders Salva Kiir and Riek Machar now want to shield themselves and anyone else implicated in wartime atrocities from justice. This week the pair audaciously proposed scrapping the landmark war crimes courtenvisioned in the peace agreement they signed, and instead focus exclusively on a truth and reconciliation commission.

It is obvious why these leaders want to avoid trials – they were commanders-in-chief of forces implicated in grave crimes in which thousands of people were killed and many hundreds of thousands more displaced, during the country’s bloody civil war.

But their claim that justice “would destabilize efforts to unite our nation” is both outdated and untrue.

Experience over the past two decades – including in Sierra Leone, the former Yugoslavia, and Chile – has shown that criminal trials for wartime atrocities have not undermined peace. On the contrary, the failure to pursue justice often fuels further crimes, such as in the Democratic Republic of Congo and, most recently, Syria.

South Sudan is a prime example of how bad things can get. Despite years, even decades, of atrocities by commanders on all sides, peace deals – including from the North-South conflict – have repeatedly rewarded abusive leaders with plum positions and provided de facto blanket amnesties. Abuse of civilians has been a path to promotion and power.

It is clear that ethnic and political divisions, prompted in part by the failure to account for past horrific crimes, have fueled the brutality that the South Sudanese have endured since December 2013.

And while truth-telling has an important role to play in countries emerging from conflict, it is complementary and not an alternative to a fair hearing before a competent court and imprisonment of those found guilty. Justice not only honors the victims rather than the abusers, it sends a strong signal that atrocities will no longer be tolerated.

On our many research trips to South Sudan, civilian victims repeatedly told us that only justice can truly break their country’s cycle of crime and conflict.

The African Union, which is responsible for establishing the hybrid court under the terms of the peace deal Kiir and Machar now want to dismantle, should press on with its plans for justice regardless. Because history shows that the alternative is likely to be another descent into violence for those who have already suffered so much. 

RSS comment feed
There are currently no comments, be the first to post one.
Add Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)


Enter the code shown above in the box below
Featured Videos
  • What is The National Dialogue?South Sudan Peace Process
  • Expectations of the National DialogueSouth Sudan Peace Process
  • Gurtong Mobile Cinema
What is The National Dialogue?1 Expectations of the National Dialogue2 Gurtong Mobile Cinema3



Gurtong Radio

Peace Efforts Earn Bishop Paride Taban Top UN Award

 English Programs     |      برامج اللغة العربية